To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: 8.270 |
From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:56:13 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Paul,Yes, determining eventual timing offsets could be helpful. However there should be no timing offset, or at least below 1% of the symbol length. 73, Stefan Am 10.02.2017 17:48, schrieb Paul Nicholson: A fine decode here too! +7.7dB. Here the decode takes 3 seconds, or just under 3 mins for a full phase search. I'll try a range of time offsets if you like. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: 8.270, Paul Nicholson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: 8.270, Paul Nicholson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8.270, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8.270, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |