Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: DK7FCs 5th VLF experiment... |
| From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 16 May 2010 17:20:09 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1274026809; bh=gwQZsp9caKKKkeoWHIvhc97XzKi0DmY2aq3TND4DB4w=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=ZWfBxSR2yL8Sq2Vjj4KavscweKhmg71SuXSKoPdky0echTbd/5W1uBtTHDkFyrmiqPm25i1Z6wgi+qJ+Bwrq9+1MoVShKnHW613VMz3gp+UImu4wh1Zhk8lM/qWT73PhTOU2XjSTTgy4N2MvSgCDUlZkBnmMa79mV75lzvClEc8= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=Tr+BKVPutM2uiCk1r3OQasv7GqhmYZmg9/GaprKSEQAzlp3ycO5JG4buI1VYoaAdljmcbIQ/23rI/aHGJ2JEC3T5L5DxMD5N/jOSQDuII4m6QPlvIcwjfuviCMNAeDPWii0nM2xHniphECHZE/zAMAPDbKm8TPc4P0K6LNll5Go= ; |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| In-reply-to: | <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1BF3@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
| References: | <002701caf394$44cbd980$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <A9E79433E60D41A9835B9989D902C5E2@JimPC> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1BF2@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1BF3@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Stefan, Markus, LF Group,I monitored 8.97kHz from 0600 this morning, but nil received unfortunately. I was not able to use the /P location, however the QRM level at home was quite low, at least until about 1000utc. But there seemed to be considerably more QRN than during the last tests, at least several dB higher noise level overall. Now I can hear some local thunderstorm activity (acoustically that is, not via the receiver...) So a negative result here this time, although I see signals were visible at DF6NM and DL4YHF - how was reception on the vertical antenna? Cheers, Jim Moritz73 de M0BMU |
| Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: DK7FC, DF6NM, Daniele Tincani |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: DK7FCs 5th VLF experiment..., mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: AW: Re: DK7FCs 5th VLF experiment..., Wolfgang Büscher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: DK7FCs 5th VLF experiment..., Stefan Schäfer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |