To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 12 Nov 2016 09:05:50 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:To:References:Reply-To:Subject:Sender:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5HQG/TlwdHk9W7RNGWUWEeFQnO2GU5V11XHxjucCB8o=; b=qc4TR6ubapPROCXS6otqBr8V4V CxJfU94d42jMbrGL+6GwGti0K9ttSynK1tCpsDjC1ReovJlB7+aUnPhQ6Fy6kI+0rSqeoMG9seq5W EVmzRdOaLNYXerhbqycq2uqvB4JVGjoECgvqJs3vhbViq1klxnN9CbIRuKp15ZlZpFcE=; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 |
> 'DK7FC JN49IK 73' > Eb/N0 = +1.1 dB BER = 37.8% Typo, BER = 37.3% Overall S/N 17.6 dB in 6.0 uHz, which is -68.6 dB in 2500 Hz. About -88 dB before sferic blanking. Each received symbol has its complex amplitude normalised by the mean of its neighbouring +/- 100 absolute symbol amplitudes. Symbols are 80 seconds each, so that's a 4.4 hour window. That seems to be about optimum (for this particular message) with a broad max: +/- 200 symbols is 0.3 dB weaker, +/- 50 symbols is 0.1 dB weaker. Stefan wrote (5th Oct): > f = 6470.00000 Hz > Start time: 05.10.2016 21:00:02 UTC > Symbol length: 140 s > Characters: 15 > CRC 16 > Coding 8K19A Unable to decode this one with the same trick. Stefan wrote: (3rd Oct) > f = 6470.00000 Hz > Start time: 03.11.2016 06:00:00 UTC > Symbol length: 30 s > Characters: 11 and 5th Oct > > A second transmission is running now > Same message, symbol length, phase orientation > and start time... From the coherent sum of these two transmissions: 'ROCK N ROLL' Eb/N0 = -0.2 BER 39.5% S/N 15.7dB in 19.7 uHz. Constant reference phase and using +/- 100 symbol normalisation (1.7 hour window). -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, Paul Nicholson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Upcoming 630m Crossband Night - Saturday, Nov 12th, Mal Hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |