To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re Propagation report |
From: | Warren Ziegler <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:11:09 -0400 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Lc4vZ1M1xROjjl4qNoqODaMfn97W/5DT5blmw7xmEOY=; b=Hy2iZ9DkXrrAUibOrb01x6v9jXmnH6xfQrNf21Tv0smxWlm5TnC0GhD/uQA7Bd3CcN mwT+YzHnWitv2MmkgBd2tEPqJKmDYk+JZ/zWNoc5Ks50fRWs+tCkOPpYzyextXpIlqVa unClFYZnaiW3EwBLyHPUHLgCuNUe1cU+2CHT4= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QP7ujI+t+xL43KJfqqA9cB7cmgyzxho8DmABCDW9Plnpb0/8DxPRS6zqG1SE2Ox6gr 6awyOCLGOI25tWw6GjOS6JX1PQPUUV0UU+p55TwCql/++qwSnNnw/f4FtVd5J3Vkb6nL xpsOidV6xuB2C5VVMRwV+x5IV1yPCVFcI7x9g= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <006001ca4763$a69a1290$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <002601ca4766$1ff29bb0$6c01a8c0@DELL4> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
David, >As an interested observer from the other side of the pond, how do you determine that you are close to the ERP limit?? >I'd be interested in knowing as I am trying to do some pro-bono work for the ARRL on getting use of 137 kHz here in the USA. I am running 4Watts ERP (measured, using field strength) on 137 kHz and this seems to be the minimum needed for someone on the East Coast to be copied in Europe on a fairly reliable basis using very slow QRSS speeds. I am licensed for 10W ERP and will try to get closer to that power level this Fall. If you want to work across the pond from further inland or use faster cw than MORE power will be needed. I am very very worried that the ARRL will settle for 1 Watt ERP (or worse 1 W EIRP).! This would be a BIG MISTAKE! About 10 years ago the ARRL was turned down for a 137 kHz ham band on the basis that it would interfere with power line carrier systems and take down the grid. Now 8 years after 9/11 it would be ironic if the grid was still susceptible to interference from hams! I live 900 feet from a high power transmission line which has Power Line Carrier signals on it and I haven't caused any interference in 5 years operation at the 4W ERP level. Bottom line - get AT LEAST 10W ERP for hams - there is NO REASON TO SETTLE FOR LESS! -- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:17 PM, David Weinreich <[email protected]> wrote:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re Propagation report, James Moritz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Propagation report, Warren Ziegler |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re Propagation report, Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re Propagation report, Peter Dodd |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |