To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: MF: EbNaut |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:02:01 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <CAA8k23S91atZChOa3nax+oA-nhRbWLATT=94+HY7eA0EZY+kFA@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23S91atZChOa3nax+oA-nhRbWLATT=94+HY7eA0EZY+kFA@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Andy wrote: > See http://www.g4jnt.com/137tx.pdf Interesting indeed, thanks. The idea of an inductor to restrict the shoot-through current is new to me and looks great. And the recovery winding over the tuning coil to restrict the load current by taking down its Q is another neat and devious idea. With my push-pull arrangement I might try a recovery winding on the output toroid and a bridge of switching diodes. It works for SMPS so I don't see why it wouldn't help in a PA. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: MF: EbNaut, Andy Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Feb 21 - 22 Best QRB/reports, Alex R7NT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: MF: EbNaut, Andy Talbot |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: MF: EbNaut, jcraig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |