To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: Coherent BPSK at 8270 from DF6NM |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 18 May 2014 18:35:23 +0000 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <CC7E3716DF7F412F8BFB5B216628F5A7@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Stefan wrote: > Does this suggest that a 100 uW signal can make it over > the pond?? No it is first necessary to be able to see the carrier at the receiver - in some sufficiently narrow bandwidth. Once the carrier is measured, a symbol period can be chosen which will send a message at close to the theoretical maximum rate even with an exceedingly weak signal. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Beacon on 477.7 kHz, F1AFJ |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Beacon on 477.7 kHz, wolf_dl4yhf |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: Coherent BPSK at 8270 from DF6NM, DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: Coherent BPSK at 8270 from DF6NM, jcraig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |