To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: Different E and H ripples on NWC |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:59:37 +0000 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Juggling the phase of the E-field and subtracting from the H-field to max the long path signal, then doing some cross-correlation with the much stronger short path signal, then subtracting an auto-correlation of the short path signal, gives http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/nwc140423a.png The peak at a delay of about 42.2 mS agrees quite well with the path difference of 12708.9 km ( 26369.52 km - 13660.62 km). 12708.9 / 300e3 = 42.36 mS The MSK signal isn't ideal for this sort of thing, given its strong and broad auto-correlation sidebands. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Gu81m, C. Groeger |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: SV8CS on 136.171 kHz now!, IK1WVQ Mauro |
Previous by Thread: | [rsgb_lf_group] VLF: Different E and H ripples on NWC, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | LF: DCF77, edgar |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |