Am 06.03.2014 14:42, schrieb Tobias DG3LV:
The lack of QSO-activity of any mode is a social "problem" in my view.
Agreed. And that's why contests are so popular on the HF bands. Actually
many people don't know what to talk except "599 tu". Same in SSB of
course. That is the actual problem. And as long as this problem exists,
every QSO mode has to die after some time. Honestly, since the last few
years there have been several new (and of course better and better and
really better (like washing agent :-) )) QSO modes or non QSO modes.
They come and go. They are interesting for some time until they become
boring. Then the next one has to come. And the intervall becomes shorter
and shorter.
But somehow, there is that mode: CW. Take a look at
http://www.dxsummit.fi/CustomFilter.aspx?customCount=50&customRange=472
and you will see that there is permanent CW activity, all around the
year. Do you remember, it is more than 10 years ago that a CW exam was
not part of the HF licence in Germany. And many of the class2 amateurs
(VHF/UHF licences) gibed "Hahaha, now CW will die out soon". But somehow
it does not, even without a new software update :-)
And that is the difference: In digimodes you press e.g. F3 to start your
call. In CW you do it by the "language" itselfe, which is fun for
itselfe! Thus, calling CQ for hours is possible without becoming boring,
just because it is music what you're listeng to! A non-CW man never
understood what that means to talk with your fingers. You can sit at
home, alone, and play your guitar and be happy, without someone
responding or applouding :-)
As the number of joining hams in a mode usually is limited, there are
always "the same suspects" who can talk to each other or even can hear
each other.
Which is not the problem. You usually have only even one XYL, evening by
evening. Often you can hear her but sometimes you can't understand her
:-) Always the same suspect.
After some time its getting boring and unpolite to have a QSO several
times a day without any "news" to tell.
Same with some XYLs after some years? :-)
So the number of QSOs is decreasing by the time, and people start to
run endless CQ-loops to gain a QSO by force. Some are not answering
another ham calling CQ but starting a CQ of their own instead. The
subbands fill up with "beacons" by that.
...but there are several OMs who are happy to receive a signal to copy!
I've got several SWL reports, even by mail (not e-mail), of OMs who are
obviously fascinated by these "beacons" and ask for a QSL. EA3LA, that's
a good example. He took a video and uploaded it to youtube. So obviously
he must be fascinated, NOT bored by that "beacon"! BTW if my power would
be 20 dB down, he would hear NIL and maybe says "the band is dead" and
tell it to his friends in the local club.
And, calling CQ is not a beacon at all, as long as someone is listening
between the calls and is ready to answer an audible signal.
There has to be a critical mass of people to keep a mode running.
Oh yes, same for CW, as we can see on LF :-(
People have to know about any new mode, so a high level of publicity
is mandatory to acheive that critical mass.
But in digimodes, where the above described effect (fascination of
listening to CW) is not present, that critical mass can never be hold!
Because, as you say, it's all the time the same if you don't know what
to tell. So, after a few QSOs, newcomers tend to become bored.
It will take a time to establish a new mode for everyday use. There is
a good chance that WSQ will become an effective keyboard to keyboard
mode that is used frequently. Just a fortnight ago we first heard
about it by you, its definitely too early to dismiss it.
Then let us wait another year and have a conclusion then :-) Maybe i am
wrong, which would be good :-)
73, Stefan/DK7FC
|