To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? |
From: | Johan Bodin <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:15:50 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <004001cf3870$27cb9620$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]> <FD8C317627A54A858DBA63792369CCC3@White> <[email protected]> <AC5E54AF66914BDB9A9E79A7E508E894@White> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
May thanks for the files Paul! Paul Nicholson wrote: > Well that 24dB is a 5 hour integration in 55uHz. It > makes a big sharp line on the spectrum though. At > VLF that counts as 'armchair'. Yes. It will never become a popular "realtime chat mode" of course... > No problem. 5 hours compressed into 22.5 seconds > and frequency shifted so that 29499 Hz is moved > to 400 Hz. wav format 32k samples/sec mono 1.4 Mbyte > > http://67.207.143.181/wh2xba1_140303a.wav > > How good is your 'CW ear' I wonder? Not exactly armchair copy but by looping the file a couple of times for "mental integration" I got XBA XBA XBA without any doubt. Yes, the second file wh2xba1_140303b.wav was slightly easier to read due to the higher CW speed. Thank you for the music Bob! An MFSK system with integrate-and-dump detectors synchronized to the TX should be capable of conveying quite a number of bits per hour. The low speed would allow many tones in a small BW. Some tones could even be reserved for commonly used words or sentences like "It is not raining in Tokyo also" :-) 73 Johan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Snowloading, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Re: LF: Activity etc., Tobias DG3LV |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?, wolf_dl4yhf |
Next by Thread: | RE: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?, Bob Raide |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |