Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?
From: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 23:55:57 +0000
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <AC5E54AF66914BDB9A9E79A7E508E894@White>
References: <[email protected]> <004001cf3870$27cb9620$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]> <FD8C317627A54A858DBA63792369CCC3@White> <[email protected]> <AC5E54AF66914BDB9A9E79A7E508E894@White>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2

Johan wrote:
> 24 dB S/N is "armchair copy".

Well that 24dB is a 5 hour integration in 55uHz.  It
makes a big sharp line on the spectrum though.  At
VLF that counts as 'armchair'.

> It would be interesting to actually listen to a
> spectrally shifted and time compressed version of
> the signal.

> Can you do that on your Linux box Paul?

No problem.  5 hours compressed into 22.5 seconds
and frequency shifted so that 29499 Hz is moved
to 400 Hz.  wav format 32k samples/sec mono 1.4 Mbyte

 http://67.207.143.181/wh2xba1_140303a.wav

How good is your 'CW ear' I wonder?

Purposely I haven't filtered it too aggressively so
you can apply your own filter to suit your ear.

--
Paul Nicholson
--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>