To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 05 Mar 2014 23:55:57 +0000 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <AC5E54AF66914BDB9A9E79A7E508E894@White> |
References: | <[email protected]> <004001cf3870$27cb9620$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]> <FD8C317627A54A858DBA63792369CCC3@White> <[email protected]> <AC5E54AF66914BDB9A9E79A7E508E894@White> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Johan wrote: > 24 dB S/N is "armchair copy". Well that 24dB is a 5 hour integration in 55uHz. It makes a big sharp line on the spectrum though. At VLF that counts as 'armchair'. > It would be interesting to actually listen to a > spectrally shifted and time compressed version of > the signal. > Can you do that on your Linux box Paul? No problem. 5 hours compressed into 22.5 seconds and frequency shifted so that 29499 Hz is moved to 400 Hz. wav format 32k samples/sec mono 1.4 Mbyte http://67.207.143.181/wh2xba1_140303a.wav How good is your 'CW ear' I wonder? Purposely I haven't filtered it too aggressively so you can apply your own filter to suit your ear. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Opds-2H hints, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?, Paul Nicholson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal?, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |