To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ? |
From: | Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:41:40 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
Hi Wolf , Got an error when trying to respondent to your private address. It was not my intent to stress you. You are doing a great job. LA5VNA S On 04.03.2014 21:19, wolf_dl4yhf wrote: > Hi Steinar, > > Patience please .. I am still busy working with the code. > But that should not prevent anyone from using either Con's original > implementation, or my adaption of it. It has been updated a couple of > times already, but I didn't advertise each new version. > The next one, which is currently 'under test', will have a selector for > the in- and output device (soundcard), noise blanker, and a few other > additions. > > I also would like to see more two-way activity there myself. > > 73, > Wolf . > > Am 04.03.2014 20:32, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >> Pity if that is the case. It was such a nice mode for us who do not have >> a big gun. >> >> LA5VNA S >> >> >> >> > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, wolf_dl4yhf |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: QRSS 120 on 29.499 starts 2200...and NAA, Laurence KL7 L |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, wolf_dl4yhf |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, ing.lindo |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |