To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ? |
From: | wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:19:12 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
Hi Steinar, Patience please .. I am still busy working with the code.But that should not prevent anyone from using either Con's original implementation, or my adaption of it. It has been updated a couple of times already, but I didn't advertise each new version. The next one, which is currently 'under test', will have a selector for the in- and output device (soundcard), noise blanker, and a few other additions. I also would like to see more two-way activity there myself. 73, Wolf . Am 04.03.2014 20:32, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: Pity if that is the case. It was such a nice mode for us who do not have a big gun. LA5VNA S |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Steinar Aanesland |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Steinar Aanesland |
Previous by Thread: | LF: AW: WSQ2 dead already ?, Marco |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ?, Steinar Aanesland |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |