Re: LF: Noise level low at 8270 :-) even over here..and Stefan/Bob

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Noise level low at 8270 :-) even over here..and Stefan/Bob
From:	schaefer <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 01:29:21 +0100
Authentication-results:	mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<39C87F3C128747C1BB0489EF123662E5@F6CNI> <018c01cf2bc5$da60ea90$0600a8c0@HPPavilion> <6CE584D4742A462191B2B6E5D6599A7D@F6CNI> <A9855CF0B0794CD9A0620F8054C7DBF8@Extensa> <[email protected]> <CC6A9FEB588041FA952F6395B3928C00@Extensa> <A5A6504332BE4D90946337AE8A051F9A@gnat> <F635A6B7C4CA4445AB73ECD4EFADBE02@Extensa>,<C9A4C489079A45F2A802D512CCB3E6A0@gnat> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Laurence, LF,

Am 17.02.2014 22:46, schrieb Laurence KL7 L:

Just tinges of Stefans signal seen last night - no full ID and XEB wasnt that too bright - no decodes any mode (op8/32, Wspr 2/15, QRS60) on MF or LF apart from that.

Oh, i didn't expect that :-) Do you have a capture?
I thought the DST stuff is quite bad in the moment?! But Jay got very good results last night. Thanks to all watching stations in the US. I see the 2nd Jay (who is new for me) is here on the reflector too, nice :-)

I will continue this night on DFCW-90, like last night.

Starting soon.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: LF: De F6CNI : QRPP test WSPR on MF this evening, (continued) Re: LF: De F6CNI : QRPP test WSPR on MF this evening, wolf_dl4yhf LF: Re: De F6CNI : QRPP test WSPR on MF this evening, ing. Domenico Lindo LF: Re: De F6CNI : QRPP test WSPR on MF this evening, André Guyé LF: Noise level low at 8270 :-), PA1SDB, Peter LF: RE: Noise level low at 8270 :-), Bohuslav Coufal LF: Re: RE: Noise level low at 8270 :-), PA1SDB, Peter LF: Re: Re: RE: Noise level low at 8270 :-), Alan Melia LF: Re: Re: Re: RE: Noise level low at 8270 :-), PA1SDB, Peter LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Noise level low at 8270 :-), Alan Melia LF: Noise level low at 8270 :-) even over here..and Stefan/Bob, Laurence KL7 L Re: LF: Noise level low at 8270 :-) even over here..and Stefan/Bob, schaefer <= LF: Re: Noise level low at 8270 :-) even over here..and Stefan/Bob, Jay Hainline Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Noise level low at 8270 :-), Markus Vester Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Noise level low at 8270 :-), Alan Melia LF: Re: Noise level low at 8270 :-), PA1SDB, Peter

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	LF: Re: Noise level low at 8270 :-) even over here..and Stefan/Bob, Jay Hainline
Next by Date:	LF: 137.7791 joining Markus and Stefan but in N Amer. band..., Bob Raide
Previous by Thread:	LF: Noise level low at 8270 :-) even over here..and Stefan/Bob, Laurence KL7 L
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: Noise level low at 8270 :-) even over here..and Stefan/Bob, Jay Hainline
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Previous by Date:

LF: Re: Noise level low at 8270 :-) even over here..and Stefan/Bob, Jay Hainline

Next by Date:

LF: 137.7791 joining Markus and Stefan but in N Amer. band..., Bob Raide

Previous by Thread:

LF: Noise level low at 8270 :-) even over here..and Stefan/Bob, Laurence KL7 L

Next by Thread:

LF: Re: Noise level low at 8270 :-) even over here..and Stefan/Bob, Jay Hainline

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]