To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | VLF: 8.97/3 kHz test transmissions |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:46:09 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAHAQVWNBD=VQ5DiaC1Ac8yn1k+11f+ugzMcoOtp82dZ1iaW8gA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> <trinity-40b68802-01c0-4f4b-9dfb-3e4e2f388e7e-1390943886815@3capp-gmx-bs07> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi all,Soon, i'm going to make a short VLF transmit test at 2.99 kHz, which is below 8.3 kHz and thus legal :-) As in every (!) VLF transmission i've done so far, i'll use the class D transmitter which has a rectangular voltage form applied to the antenna system. Maybe i'll just leave the resonance as it was in the previous tests, which is legal too ;-) I do assume that my harmonic power, radiated on 8.97 kHz (as well as on 26.91 kHz, 80.73 kHz and so on), will not cause interferences to commercial users of the spectrum, such as ALPHA RSDN or WX researchers. All in all it means that the transmission on 2.99 kHz is legal. Very fine :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: decent conditions to YV7 on 137 also..., Bob Raide |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8.97/3 kHz test transmissions, jcraig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |