Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:32:22 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAHAQVWNBD=VQ5DiaC1Ac8yn1k+11f+ugzMcoOtp82dZ1iaW8gA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> <trinity-40b68802-01c0-4f4b-9dfb-3e4e2f388e7e-1390943886815@3capp-gmx-bs07> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
PS: There is no power limitation in that VLF range below 8.3 kHz, it is not even amateur radio by definition so we do not act as radio amateurs. Actually everyone can transmit in that range, at least in DL or other countries where no NoV is needed.

So actually, i can radiate several 10 mW ERP at 12 kHz as long as i am TXing at 4 kHz fundamental frequency, because i do not cause interferences? :-)) Isn't that nice? :-)

73, Stefan



Am 29.01.2014 15:17, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
Ooooh, this is very intersting! :-)

Does it mean that i can do VLF experiments at e.g. 18 kHz by generating a VERY distorted 6 kHz signal? The groundwave is at 6 kHz, i.e. below 8.3 kHz and i can assume that the 18 kHz harmonic will not cause interferences to any services operating there!! :-)
Horray!! :-)
When using a resonant antenna, resonated to 18 kHz, i can even optimise the power losses of the transmitter.

According to https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/fig_02_25a.png we should try 12 kHz, eheheeem, i mean 4 kHz, wehere propagation should be best :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC




Am 28.01.2014 22:18, schrieb LZ:
Dave,

You wrote:
... In other words NO signal must escape that is higher than that 8.3 kHz limit -That is it!! -end of!! Dave
No, wrong.
Right: "In other words NO *interfering* signal must escape that is higher than that 8.3 kHz limit..."

Laura

Gesandt von mein PettiFogPhone



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>