Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:17:45 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <trinity-40b68802-01c0-4f4b-9dfb-3e4e2f388e7e-1390943886815@3capp-gmx-bs07>
References: <CAHAQVWNBD=VQ5DiaC1Ac8yn1k+11f+ugzMcoOtp82dZ1iaW8gA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> <trinity-40b68802-01c0-4f4b-9dfb-3e4e2f388e7e-1390943886815@3capp-gmx-bs07>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Ooooh, this is very intersting! :-)

Does it mean that i can do VLF experiments at e.g. 18 kHz by generating a VERY distorted 6 kHz signal? The groundwave is at 6 kHz, i.e. below 8.3 kHz and i can assume that the 18 kHz harmonic will not cause interferences to any services operating there!! :-)
Horray!! :-)
When using a resonant antenna, resonated to 18 kHz, i can even optimise the power losses of the transmitter.

According to https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/fig_02_25a.png we should try 12 kHz, eheheeem, i mean 4 kHz, wehere propagation should be best :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC




Am 28.01.2014 22:18, schrieb LZ:
Dave,

You wrote:
... In other words NO signal must escape that is higher than that 8.3 kHz limit 
-That is it!! -end of!! Dave
No, wrong.
Right: "In other words NO *interfering* signal must escape that is higher than that 
8.3 kHz limit..."

Laura

Gesandt von mein PettiFogPhone



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>