| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: RE: Clemens on MF!! |
| From: | wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Jan 2014 22:32:44 +0100 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| In-reply-to: | <34613E4DA8F14D389A2BCF8A04DDF0DA@Clemens0811> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <35FE4D7949D24153B93AD287570B1AA6@Clemens0811> <[email protected]> <07DCC8F8EED14FA7A932FF8F90ED27A6@Clemens0811> <[email protected]> <34613E4DA8F14D389A2BCF8A04DDF0DA@Clemens0811> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
Hi Clemens,thanks for the new QSO. An additional quarter-Neper helps a lot :o), and I can imagine that my 100 W PEP (which I use when @ home) / 60 m wire antenna, the signal wasn't so easy to copy. My question was if, for comparison, you can connect the wires of your dipole so they form a large top-hat, i.e. a vertical antenna without nulls in some direction. All the best and have a nice weekend, Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD . |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: LF: RE: Clemens on MF!!, Clemens Paul |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: VLF: 8270 (antenna and grounding), Bob Raide |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: RE: Clemens on MF!!, Clemens Paul |
| Next by Thread: | RE: LF: RE: Clemens on MF!!, Clemens Paul |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |