Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Loop Antenna Article

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Loop Antenna Article
From: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 18:22:23 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <CAMFjj73fi8WDyawm0B04PHO2D+xJijASDMW1_snGLgED=hgZPw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMFjj73fi8WDyawm0B04PHO2D+xJijASDMW1_snGLgED=hgZPw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
Hello Warren,

I don't remember exactly in which group it was (possibly the *V*LF group) but there was an interesting topic about how to 'arrange' a given number of ferrite rods... the result was bundling them "in parallel" was much inferior than arranging them "in series" to form a long, but thin rod. This was proven by experiment here, but the 60 cm long ferrite antenna was still inferior to a single-turn air core loop with 60 cm diameter (on VLF).

All the best for 2014,
  Wolf.

Am 28.12.2013 17:26, schrieb Warren Ziegler:
Hello the list,

I have been searching for an article posted a few years ago concerning receiving loops with a title like "Calibrating Receiving Loops Using DFC77" - as I recall the main thrust of the article is that there is an asymptotic limit to the sensitivity of ferriite loops as you increase the size, and that limit is soon reached. Can anyone point me to a copy? (Searching for the article is what prompted me to check the Yahoo group).

Many thanks & HNY

--
73 Warren K2ORS
                WD2XGJ
                WD2XSH/23
                WE2XEB/2
                WE2XGR/1
                WG2XRS/1




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>