Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: OPERA overload?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: OPERA overload?
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:28:28 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <005d01cefd22$36f84a00$6401a8c0@JAYDELL>,<A99644D9D1684025BE96C4ECBEB46741@AGB> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hello Bob,

Am 20.12.2013 18:54, schrieb Bob Raide:
G et all;
Things have changed over this pasted year or so.  Many more new stations have come on and these newbies are running lower power and RXers that may not be up to what some of the veteran ops are using.  There really isn't allot of room for QRO in the 630 meter band

Do you get complaints? What is the argumentation? What do they say? Same as here? 10000s of crashed air planes due to NDB interference? Overloaded RX because your signal is 30 dB above the noise in 1 Hz NBW?
One day the A-Team will come and shoot down the antenna and PA, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MVonyVSQoM ;-)
Or is it maybe just envy, sometimes?
I assume Jay doesn't see a problem when you go QRO sometimes, like Markus doesn't when i do. And i do not when Markus does or DK6SX/p on MF or DK2DB. It's just all fine :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>