Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "

from [Hartmut Wolff] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?
From: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:30:03 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <5C6D6BC04A584E798275EA32CAB71912@White>
References: <[email protected]>,<FE3A7DFD6107452292593AFA159E9EC7@White> <[email protected]> <5C6D6BC04A584E798275EA32CAB71912@White>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 
Am 2013-12-12 22:48, schrieb Markus Vester:

Unfortunately 74613 Hz looks a bit noisier here than 614: 
http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/df6nm_74kHz.jpg


Markus,
I have here not the strong DCF77 noise:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50178231/2013-12-12-2215_74600kHz.jpg
74613,5 Hz is looking good in your screenshot. Just above 74614 Hz is a weak Loran line 
--
73
Hartmut
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?, Markus Vester
Next by Date:  Re: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?, Markus Vester
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?, Markus Vester
Next by Thread:  RE: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?, Bob Raide
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]