To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band |
From: | pat <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 08 Sep 2013 22:31:24 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected] |
Cc: | Graham <[email protected]> |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1378675886; bh=swzqGT7bzAclUZPIhLMdJU/0bGvwiPziQg9lLt4zUxY=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qzI3CoG2Lv+icwyG9EQVDcp98qaeYmYs1SYBQKMfwIi3uKlVdCJjFam54opO/WOuZ XUyndEfz1jZO/nG9EgOv+FZk4feQRz1r5eF9IupmeyhjLAObN58IqmRFOygD9L6XPY OnqaYY0AMfOwM8jX/mf3vz7RNXsfppkDhmws/PEQ= |
In-reply-to: | <903E120C9B9747489DF5329EEC0657B4@AGB> |
Organization: | G4GVW |
References: | <CAMFjj72EVAUx61a7rZeR41ufXx4z2A2h+UK+DYBj=EPqd0waxg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <903E120C9B9747489DF5329EEC0657B4@AGB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 |
Don't forget that some of us also have fond memories of "Someone's
Waving Magazine", Graham!
73 On 08/09/13 18:29, Graham wrote: And those who go a little more , Cams' comic so im reliably informed G, But , what actually is he talking about in the article ? -------------------------------------------------- From: "pat" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 6:20 PM To: <[email protected]> Cc: "Warren Ziegler" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz bandWarren,While many of us (particularly those of us of a certain age) have an affection stretching back to near childhood for that publication it is not for nothing that we nickname it "Practically Witless Monthly" :>)73 On 08/09/13 02:53, Warren Ziegler wrote:Tony Nailer G4CFY has a bit in his "Practical Wireless" column "Technical for the terrified" this month on the 137 kHz band in which he writes it off as worthless."With the limitation of antenna efficiency together with a bandwidth of only 100Hz, there really isn't much that can be done with this band."Anyone on the list know Tony? Who is in the best position to write a rebuttal that PW will publish? -- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1-- 73 de pat g4gvw es gd dx qth nr Felixstowe East Coast UK -- 73 de pat g4gvw es gd dx qth nr Felixstowe East Coast UK |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band, pat |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band, Laurence KL7 L |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band, pat |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |