Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected], [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop |
| From: | Chris Trask <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:14:36 -0700 (GMT-07:00) |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=YDU79cR9kpwVf9q6vP58/aO1SmerzF+TGo5X3/jevsB6wdVcqrXueaDUgZ6jOQRP; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
> > I am looking for a suitable circuit to use with the blown > loops (they are not completely dead but have a serious loss > of sensitivity but disassembly is certain to destroy the > loop amplifier). I suspect it's not so easy to form a 1 > metre loop with aluminium tubing so the loops can be > re-used for experiments. > > I was thinking something along these lines: > > http://www.pm.keirle.com/3_radio/hf_loop_ant/hf_loop_ant.htm > > http://www.ik4hdq.net/doc/testi/smlloop.pdf > > http://www.vlf.it/looptheo7/looptheo7.htm > > http://www.vlf.it/lowfloop/lowfloop.htm > You might want to add this to your list of suitable alternatives: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~christrask/Paper009.html Chris Trask N7ZWY / WDX3HLB Senior Member IEEE http://www.home.earthlink.net/~christrask/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Wellbrook Loop, Roelof Bakker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: RE: Re: Wellbrook Loop, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Wellbrook Loop, Andy Talbot |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop, mal hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |