Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: RTTY vs. AMTOR |
| From: | g3zjo <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:33:33 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <DF81F8D10F134701B797824F9B93DA4F@PcMinto> <CF6C61F12A384E648C56408F22F5083F@gnat> <A084B9DCD8B34898B4DD484086406269@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <84B77AD08F5F42849E6492B9048EC349@IBM7FFA209F07C> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 |
Hi Stefan On 06/03/2013 15:09, Stefan Schäfer wrote: MultiPSK has AMTOR with FEC, yes we don't want ARQ do we. I have run it, same width as RTTY the FEC may help but its just as fast it is QSO mode.Eddie, Gary, Chris, Minto, MF,I've read a bit about RTTY and AMTOR in Wikipedia. Maybe AMTOR would help us a bit more, even when not used in that ARQ mode but also in beacon stile, due to the FEC? Again I will ask the question, why is MFSK not being considered I am running it at the moment on 478.200. MFSK4 is on Fldigi can you try it now.? Eddie Eddie, what was the name of the program that offers that mode for free? I cannot find your recent email where you already mentioned it.73, Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Testing RTTY 478.200kHz, Minto Witteveen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: RTTY test transmission, Minto Witteveen |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: RTTY vs. AMTOR, Stefan Schäfer |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: RTTY vs. AMTOR, Minto Witteveen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |