Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: RTTY vs. AMTOR |
| From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:09:52 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <84B77AD08F5F42849E6492B9048EC349@IBM7FFA209F07C> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <DF81F8D10F134701B797824F9B93DA4F@PcMinto> <CF6C61F12A384E648C56408F22F5083F@gnat> <A084B9DCD8B34898B4DD484086406269@PcMinto> <[email protected]> <84B77AD08F5F42849E6492B9048EC349@IBM7FFA209F07C> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Eddie, Gary, Chris, Minto, MF,I've read a bit about RTTY and AMTOR in Wikipedia. Maybe AMTOR would help us a bit more, even when not used in that ARQ mode but also in beacon stile, due to the FEC? Eddie, what was the name of the program that offers that mode for free? I cannot find your recent email where you already mentioned it. 73, Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: RTTY Protocol, Chris |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Testing RTTY 478.200kHz, g3zjo |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: RTTY Protocol, Chris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RTTY vs. AMTOR, g3zjo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |