Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: wsjtx |
| From: | Joe Taylor <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:19:21 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <006501cdb516$5d1a3900$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
| References: | <000a01cdb507$101bd370$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <003101cdb50d$a59685c0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <006501cdb516$5d1a3900$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 |
Hi Mal and all, G3KEV wrote: The signals were good on the waterfall with me. I did not save any of the data since I was just experimenting. of course the problem could have been at the TX end. OK. The problem could also be at the Rx end, or it could be a fault in the decoder. If you save the data, we can find out which. Otherwise, we will be no wiser. I have never needed to try to decode signals at the levels of strength claimed(very weak) because I have large antennas and signals are always strong from those that indicate that they are active on LF/MF. JT9 is a weak signal mode. Of course, any of us who always receive strong signals are better off making QSOs with a general-purpose mode such as good-old-CW.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, Markus Vester |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: no decodes, help needed, Markus Vester |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: wsjtx, mal hamilton |
| Next by Thread: | LF: jt9 on 500KHz, g3zjo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |