Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: CMSK |
| From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:38:53 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <66C690FA65054015B54D3DC3A6699556@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
OK...Edgar from Tasmania passed me to this webpage http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/CMSK/cmsk.htm showing the CMSK mode. Probably well knows by the old experts :-) So what about that mode for very weak signal modes on LF? Pros and Cons? Is this woth to try above 10000 km distance? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 12.09.2012 20:43, schrieb pws: Hi, Question: why do all those professional services for submarines down at LF/VLF use MSK and not any kind of that advanced stuff you are talking about? As far as I know they are using non-linear transmitters like my cellphone does. Peter, df3lp |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: MF tonite, C. Groeger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: CMSK, John Andrews |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: slow WSPR?, mal hamilton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: CMSK, John Andrews |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |