To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy |
From: | "Brian Rogerson" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:03:42 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <HEFED85ZZUQKOMOMKFDA96SR9GFHDZY.3e53fbc5@Charlie_Drake> |
References: | <007001c2d860$227ef1c0$09dc9384@jka> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Hi All I'm transmitting at the moment and hope that is on 137773.4Hz Brian CT1DRP At 21:48 19/02/2003, you wrote: Hi Peter, John's right. My display was 0.05Hz (egads!) low last night. The Loran line (top one on my display) should be sitting at '774.03. All the best, Steve 2/19/2003 4:44:51 PM, "John Andrews" <[email protected]> wrote: >Peter, > >The Loran line that shows at 774.03 on my screen shots is at its calculated >frequency, so the other readings from those shots should be pretty exact. > >John Andrews > > > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy, Steve Dove |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy, Johan Bodin |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy, Steve Dove |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy, Johan Bodin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |