Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Comparison of QRSS speed performance. |
| From: | "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:48:21 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <003801c2f2f3$e0614140$1b00a8c0@dellboy> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Hello Dave and Alan,Really impressing how little power is needed to travel 220km at 136kHz. The 360mW needed for the CW copy should be no more than about 1mW ERP I guess, QRSS60 does the job with no more than 2uW ERP. 73, Rik ON7YD At 17:27 25/03/2003 +0000, you wrote: Dear all. I did some tests today with Alan G3NYK at about 220km distance, to compare the performance of different QRSS speeds under real band conditions. How much better is QRSS60 than QRSS10 or QRSS3... or CW? Find out our findings at http://www.wireless.org.uk/signoise.htm 73 Dave G3YXM. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: DCF42/49 IM reduced, MarkusVester |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: TA 27 March, John Andrews |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Comparison of QRSS speed performance., John Andrews |
| Next by Thread: | LF: POUR LES FRANCOPHONES, f1tay |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |