Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Measuring earth resistance

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Measuring earth resistance
From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:15:07 +0000
In-reply-to: <002301c2a517$e080e650$0000a398@yourw92p4bhlzg>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Dear Ralph, Dick, LF Group,

At 10:29 16/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Dick, conventional wisdom says that the soil resistance becomes lower as the soil becomes wetter. However your measurements indicate the antenna ground loss becomes greater with increased wetness. Perhaps there is another coupling mechanism here. For example, if one had a loop antenna suspended in free space, would the ground loss resistance become zero?


The resistivity of the soil may well become lower as it gets wetter - but the bulk resistance of the soil is only one of many factors contributing to the loss resistance of the antenna. In "professional" LF antennas, so the text books say, loss resistance is predominantly due to resistive losses in the ground connection - but in the case of amateur antennas it is different, since these are much higher impedance, have a shorter path for the ground return currents to flow and are much closer to the ground. Under these conditions, I think the dominant factor contributing to the loss resistance is dielectric loss due to the RF electric field around the antenna heating up the ground and buildings, trees etc around the antenna. This is supported by observations showing that loss resistance decreases with increasing frequency for most amateur verticals (with the same antenna current, the antenna voltage will decrease with frequency, leading to lower dielectric loss - you would expect it the other way round due to increasing skin effect if the resistance of the ground was the major contributor), and the fact that improvements to ground systems quickly reach a point of diminishing returns, where adding further rods, radials, counterpoises, etc. makes almost no difference to the loss resistance.

Almost everyone using verticals seems to find that their antenna loss resistance goes up in wet conditions - I would imagine the same would be true to some extent with loops, with increasing conductivity resulting in larger eddy currents flowing in the ground, and so higher losses.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>