To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Jason Tests |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:57:55 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
At 13:50 23/01/2002 +0000, you wrote: Dear Jim, >I can run the beacon again tonight in anyone is interested - is 135.910kHz >a good frequency, or is there a better one? May I look at it the other way? 137.5xxx is an absolute mass of lines here. 73, Brian 73 Brian CT1DRP IN51QD 41 09 58N 08 39 11W http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian Dear Brian,So if I transmit a beacon signal on 135.91 at around 2000utc this evening, would that be OK? Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: SMT Devices, Talbot Andrew |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Reference Osc. Waveform, Larry Kayser |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Jason Tests, Brian Rogerson |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Jason Tests, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |