LF: MP letter

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: MP letter
From:	"Walter Blanchard" <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 13 Apr 2001 08:30:48 +0100
In-reply-to:	<004501c0c376$2c0116c0$1a30fd3e@compaq>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

At 18:29 12/04/01 Thursday, Tracey wrote:

Would somebody like to come up with a "standard" letter that we could
use?



Agree with Laurie - strongly recommend we do NOT use a standard letter.
Hundreds of identical letters from members of a single organisation
are treated as just one letter. Use your own wording.
No harm in agreeing what the technicalities are, however!

What Alan says is interesting. Might this mean that rival companies
would start boosting the power of their signals to over-ride
competition???

Walter G3JKV

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re: Re. PLC, Tracey Gardner LF: Re: Re: Re. PLC, Laurie Mayhead LF: MP letter, Walter Blanchard <=

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Decca 1876 schematic needed, Walter Blanchard
Next by Date:	LF: Re. New station?, Laurie Mayhead
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: Re: Re. PLC, Laurie Mayhead
Next by Thread:	LF: re PLC, Alan Melia
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]