To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: BS Reflector status |
From: | Albert <westberg@xs4all.nl> |
Date: | Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:09:07 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <4FCB490B.1050900@legal-medicine.de> |
References: | <4FCB225B.7020209@legal-medicine.de> <C6AD77CD-531B-4403-AFA1-7203BEA56CB9@googlemail.com> <1338719720.38541.YahooMailNeo@web171605.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <4FCB490B.1050900@legal-medicine.de> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
All,No pros and cons, just a few words from an OM. I know the Reflector is slow and some times has small problems but I am used to it and see no major reason for this sudden change. 73, Albert PA0A |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, manginbenoit.pro |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, pws |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, Gerhard Hickl |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |