Re: LF: "SR cal" in spectrum lab question.

[Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>]

Hi Wolf, LF,

I'm greatly looking forward to this new SL version! Please tell us when 
it is finished! This would allow me to run the grabbers much more 
flexible and use a single PC in the shack on the roof, with reduced CPU 
load.
Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 02.06.2012 09:40, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
> Hello Peter,
>
> At the moment multiple running instances of SL don't "talk to each 
> other" about the sample rate, even if they use the same audio device 
> for input.
> In future versions, it will be possible to have the first instance 
> running as 'master', providing a resampled(!) audio stream for all 
> other instances. Those 'slave'-instances don't connect directly to the 
> soundcard, but to the first running instance. I am not sure about how 
> to connect the instances yet (via shared memory, or -even better- via 
> TCP/IP so the slaves could run on physically different PCs if necessary).
> All the best,
>   Wolf .
>
> Am 01.06.2012 20:50, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter:
> > Hello...
> >
> > I was wondering the following:
> >
> > I have here 4x Spectrum Lab task running at one PC to serve my 
> > SUB9KHz grabber page at www.qsl.net/pa1sdb
> > I use that Sampling Rate detector in all 4 Spectrum Lab tasks.
> > Is that OK, or need I only one Sampling Rate detector that 
> > callibrates the other 3 tasks to ?
> > (one master - 3 clients without that SR cal active)
> >
> > 73's Peter - PA1SDB