Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp
From: Chris Dillon <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 12:13:12 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <003a01cd3cee$0e74a1a0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1

Hi Peter
Sorry I missed your earlier posts in the change to Yahoo Groups. I'd like to try a balanced probe - are you using the same circuit (with INA111) as on the www.vlf.it site or have you modified it?

73 Chris G3WCD





On 29/05/2012 20:39, pws wrote:
Moin Stefan,

You wrote:
...
How sensitive is the balanced probe to shielding effects (trees, houses)?

Don't know yet. But see those screenshots. There are much less
local interference lines visible.

Any difference to the E field probe?

This IS an e-field probe, but a balanced one.
Got the idea from there:
http://www.vlf.it/immagine/minimal_E.html
(tnx)

Where do you have the INA111 from?

From Farnell, the TLE2426 voltage splitter too.

What are the differences on 137 kHz? Is there a significant S/N improvement?

Not tested yet. But as I wrote it should work.

Peter, df3lp





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>