To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp |
From: | Chris Dillon <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 30 May 2012 12:13:12 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <003a01cd3cee$0e74a1a0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
Hi PeterSorry I missed your earlier posts in the change to Yahoo Groups. I'd like to try a balanced probe - are you using the same circuit (with INA111) as on the www.vlf.it site or have you modified it? 73 Chris G3WCD On 29/05/2012 20:39, pws wrote: Moin Stefan, You wrote:...How sensitive is the balanced probe to shielding effects (trees, houses)?Don't know yet. But see those screenshots. There are much less local interference lines visible.Any difference to the E field probe?This IS an e-field probe, but a balanced one. Got the idea from there: http://www.vlf.it/immagine/minimal_E.html (tnx)Where do you have the INA111 from?From Farnell, the TLE2426 voltage splitter too.What are the differences on 137 kHz? Is there a significant S/N improvement?Not tested yet. But as I wrote it should work. Peter, df3lp |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: 475 kc Exiter, mal hamilton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: VLF/LF-Preamp, pws |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |