Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: 16 bit vs 24 bit ADC?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 16 bit vs 24 bit ADC?
From: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:54:42 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23RcqVfXC9MWoTWm9yESwuSG5ZP6fFFZA2y2j-C4f0DPHw@mail.gmail.com> <80A163C9035C44FBA23C7501118A6FDF@JimPC> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23T3MFrnUrj=ccAwOxEygb7cKfFVrcZPhMpEkaqU5Qs=Zg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
Z-usanet-msgid: XID398PLDP3U0768X36
Bill,

  thanks for sharing your results about comparing 12- vs 16-bit QRSS reception.
You showed that, when the reception mode allows a very great reduction in the sampling rate,
going down in the mHz range, the processing gain thus obtained makes somewhat irrelevant
the finesse of the original amplitude resolution, when digitizing. And this was your original
question, which you have adequately answered to.  For this kind of applications, a 24-bit
sound card gives no practical advantages over a 16-bit one.

Just a note. This result cannot be generalized to SDR in its broader sense. If you cannot
dig into the noise with mHz resolution, but when what you want or need to achieve is e.g.
an SSB reception done with SDR technology, you cannot have a final sampling rate much lower
than, let's say, 8 kHz. In this case it is not possible to count on such a big processing gain.
It is for this kind of applications that 24 bits show an edge over 16 bits. When you need
a dynamic range of 120 dB in such a bandwidth, you badly need the more bits you can
obtain from your digitizer....

To mention still another English (or is this more American ?) proverb : YMMV
Your Mileage May Vary   :-)

73  Alberto  I2PHD

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>