Re: LF: Who is RCK?

[Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>]

Hello Veit,

Maybe this is my signal. The distance between C and K is higher than between R, which could be a F, if you missed the first dot. So probably it was a CQ call of a station ending with C ;-) You must then have an offset of some 10 Hz i assume. I could take a look in the capture archive but currently i am transmitting on that PC and don't want to risk to many phase glitches....

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 19.11.2011 11:50, schrieb DL7ET:

I found a station in QRSS on 136 khz band called RCK in my screenshots, on Nov 11 at 2000UTC

 

knows anybody the full callsign?

 

don't wonder about drifting QRG, thats my converter when it's warming up.

 

tks Veit 

DL7ET

----- Original Message -----

From: Bill de Carle

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 12:32 AM

Subject: Re: LF: 136.173

At 06:57 PM 11/18/2011, Mal G3KEV wrote:

LF
Nw active 136.173 Khz qrs 30 qso mode es  QSX 7033 XBAND

Hi Mal:
I copied your entire callsign on 136.1728 Khz just now - gave you a call on 7033 Khz at normal CW speed but did not hear any reply.  Your QRSS signal was not audible here in the 2.4 Khz bandwidth I use for the grabber.  There are several other just barely audible CW signals (probably all from NA) in the passband.  Strongest by far is Mitch Powell's "MP" (I can copy his hi-speed CW ID easily by ear).  Mitch is not visible on my grabber because I don't show enough range but I can hear him without changing the Rx settings.
73,  Bill VE2IQ