Mal
Am 27.10.2011 18:28, schrieb mal hamilton:
Stefan
The majority of signals on LF es MF are
suitable for a QSO but the present culture seems to favour BEACONS, QRS
MODE when it is not necessary and QSL via Internet.
In the beginning it was all CW QSO mode and
it worked FB.
I do not bother any more because it is a
waste of time listening/watching useless repeative part callsigns.
It has all been done before and better so
what are current operators trying to achieve.
What are you doing on HF that wasn't done before?
My suggestion is to get back to CW QSO mode
Have thought the same, some days ago. I will try to move activity to CW
a bit more, at least on the weekend...
73, Stefan
, use QRS only under vy poor propagation
condx if you think it helps.
Use LF es MF like all the other bands, HF es
VHF where CW is the norm, SSB as appropriate and likewise data modes.
73 de mal/g3kev
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Thursday, October 27, 2011 9:34 AM
Subject:
Re: LF: vo1na 27-10.jpg
Hi Joe, LF,
Your signal in a QRSS-10 window. Would be suitable for a QSO :-)
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/10_402283.jpg
73, Stefan/DK7FC
Am 27.10.2011 10:35, schrieb henny van elst:
Gm LF,
Capture vo1na,
henny pa3cpm
73's
Het bericht kan nu met het volgende bijlagen of koppelingen worden
verzonden:
vo1na 27-10.jpg
Opmerking: Sommige e-mailprogramma's staan ter beveiliging tegen
virussen het verzenden of ontvangen van bepaalde bestandsbijlagen niet
toe. Controleer de beveiligingsinstellingen voor uw e-mail als u wilt
weten hoe bijlagen worden afgehandeld.
|
|
