To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: noise on VK and earth dipole tests |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:53:17 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAKvcm2d-GA=EajQfQCS54WncqBsFwA5GjpgQpuPcjrtP_rePag@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAKvcm2dLYx4_raGoTnAJL-xxLZEEmGStcJHhv8QduMxkxShD1Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAKvcm2fe9sMFhQb30jigmzi+_Cw8k31iSDLOFY7n2x3J0a9ODg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi John, Yes, the more the better.If it is just one rod and the overall losses would be 450 Ohm, i expect a high ground conductivity which would be worse for an earth antenna... Maybe the elevated wire in the forest is the best (and long lasting) antenna system for /p. Then it must be a closed loop (and Scott and others use) or a looong earth antenna or just a full size dipole, lossy but full size :-) Some dry old and tall trees would be excellent, even as an insulator ;-) 73, Stefan Am 15.10.2011 18:43, schrieb John Rabson: On 15 Oct 2011, at 14:14CEST, Stefan Schäfer wrote:Hello Dimitris, I think the 450 Ohm you get is mostly caused by the earth electrode resistance. So if you spend e.g. 2 instead of one earth rod, maybe you can get a 3 dB improvement?The more the better up to 6 or 7 rods. > From cave radio tests we find that the earth rods need to be spaced by 2 or more times their depth. John F5VLF |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: noise on VK and earth dipole tests, John Rabson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: DL3NSW, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: noise on VK and earth dipole tests, John Rabson |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: noise on VK and earth dipole tests, Dimitrios Tsifakis |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |