Hello Bill,
This looks very promising to me, although ID is still insecure.
21 mHz is a good choice but you should have enabled "one pixel per FFT
bin" in the 1st register card of the spectrum display settings.
Furthermore the spectrogram should scroll a bit slower, about 10 seconds
per pixel is best i find.
Which noise reduction setting did you choose? Any band limiting and
noise blanking?
All in all i would say that this is my trace since time and frequency
matches. But we should repeat this once again for beeing sure :-)
Looking forward to that!
I will TX this night again, unless the rain isn't to strong (have
replaced that stone pot above the coil since it causes to many losses...).
Thanks for watching! Very interesting :-)
73, Stefan/DK7FC
Am 07.09.2011 14:23, schrieb Bill de Carle:
At 04:14 AM 9/7/2011, Stefan wrote:
Hello Bill,
Fine :-) Can we have a capture showing the trace? What was the time
of the detection?
73, Stefan
Am 07.09.2011 03:23, schrieb Bill de Carle:
Grabber is on tonight in Ontario Canada. If I stand far back and
squint I'd say there was a trace (not decodable) on his frequency :-)
I should have included a link to the capture. Freq is right but maybe
it was some other signal? FFT was 21 mHz per bin and the trace
occurred at approx 0055 .. 0110 - Here it is:
http://www.nrtco.net/~ve2iq/grabs/capt15.jpg
Bill VE2IQ
|
