Scott
I will give it some thought. I have worked
VE7 es W6/W7 es KL7 stations on 160metres CW over the years
during the winter months.
so like you say it is likely that it can
be done on 500 and possibly 137.
If someone else beats me to the post so be
it !!
On 160 metres the optimum time was coming
up to my sunrise. I have also worked on CW ZL es KH6 plus
others in the past.
My 160 antenna is 3/8 wave inv L up over
100 ft vertical and my 600 metre antenna is 1/4 wave at the
same height.
73 de mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, September
03, 2011 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS
Mal when are you planning to test the path from G3 to VE7?
Surely you're not going to allow someone else to do it first :-)
We await the viability of the path to be demonstrated at amateur
power levels.
As DCF39 becomes VERY audible at times (typically best in Nov)
it is possible that an amateur QRSS/DFCW signal could make it
over here...
GL
Scott
VE7TIL CN89dk
http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/
On 9/2/2011 10:20 AM, mal hamilton wrote:
You have just verified what I have
always said.
Yes keep an open mind and experiment
but in the end all will come to the same conclusion as
Yourself.
QRSS/DFCW.
Over the years I have had a multitude
of private emails saying the same thing. We are not alone
!!
de g3kev
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September
02, 2011 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS
On 9/2/2011 12:38 AM, mal hamilton wrote:
While it is interesting to
experiment with different modes
Mal is this really you?
I agree with you on the QRSS/DFCW comment!