Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?
From: pws <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:58:27 +0200
In-reply-to: <8CA4D9371AE446EDAA7576F42D258CF1@JimPC>
References: <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4379ED2AAB4@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <9CD1E11E8BC9402CB4AECECAC4088443@JimPC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <8CA4D9371AE446EDAA7576F42D258CF1@JimPC>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 SUSE/3.1.11 Thunderbird/3.1.11

Hi Jim,

You wrote:
...
I would be interested to know what method you used to determine SNR for the
different rod configurations.
...

Simply by going the broadband way and using a very low noise, very low impedance pre-amplifier. It's easy to get voltage noises below 1nV/sqrt(Hz) by running some transistors in parallel. Today I know that it's a low "Rbb" of the transistor type what makes the difference. Unfortunately it's hard to find this value in datasheets. I remember using BC327 or BC337 running at ~10mA each. Fortunately current noise doesn't matter here.

The antennas had an inductance elsewhere around 0.5 mH. So the self resonances lowered by 200-300pF added by the transistors had been at least 1 octave above the region of interest.

Obtaining spectra at a quiet spot will immediately showed the differences of SNRs since some constant signals were available not influenced by the ionosphere e.g. 147 kHz or Loran-C. I had/have such quiet spot here for field-days, a constructor's trailer made of sheet included. This was of importance for shielding the computer. Checking the depths of *both* "nulls" will give some hints about the balance.

Peter, df3lp


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>