Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: DK7FC, DF6NM in YO and 4X

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC, DF6NM in YO and 4X
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:59:39 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAK59VFMG+gwJRFyzkYd_5p0ai0UokEz2-oQzAw=dTx7WBJFsZA@mail.gmail.com> <81E3EB057A864BED87E8D71A3F1E2CFC@White> <709BC73E7BD6499BA9FC97E456F77BAF@JimPC> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Hello Jim, Piotr, Alex, Markus, Chris, Mike, LF :-)

Thanks all to this interesting observations and your reports about the LF ferrite antennas and propagated signals. I'm sure there will be more useful nights for such tests, anyway the tests have been successful, very happy about that. If QRSS-60 is possible with O copy in such conds, CW should be possible on a quiet sunday morning. Maybe we can test that later :-)

Piotr, congrats to your successful reception. The QRM is stronger at home but the signal levels as well, compared to the previous antenna. So if you go outside with that ferrite antenna, you can easily gain 20 dB S/N or so. Fascinating, 800 km distance with an indoor antenna during QRN+QRM!! :-)

Looking forward to further tests!!

A few minutes ago, i improved my ferrite antenna a bit more: Have replaced the fixed 2.2 nF cap by (1+1+0.15+0.033)nF + a variable 47pF cap with an axis for hand adjustment + a switchable 47pF cap. This is rather compact than a 500 pF variable cap and reduces the volume of conductive materials near the ferrite rod. So this allows me now to easily tune over the entire amateur LF band. Even more useful: If i tune the variable cap to 137.7 kHz and just switch the fixed cap, i come out at 136.5 kHz (CW!) without the need to further adjustments. Excellent, isn't it? :-))
The high-Z preamp is still an open project but soon i have it completed.

What a fun!

73, Stefan/DK7FC



Am 26.08.2011 03:43, schrieb Piotr Mlynarski:
James Moritz pisze:
Dear Stefan, Markus, LF Group,

A screenshot of DK7FC and DF6NM received in IO91VR between 2230 and 0000utc, with 84mHz FFT resolution, and using the ferrite rod antenna. DK7FC seems to be about 6dB stronger than DF6NM here, on average. But not really a very good night for testing receive antennas - the QRN level is so high that the proverbial piece of wet string would be just as good!

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU

Dear Markus, Stefan, Jim, LF

Maybe this night is not a very good one for testing different rx antennae according to Jim observations , nevertheless, some of us decided to do it ... :) Enclosed, there is a SL capture from my night 'experiments' - at first, i have used my air loop antenna ( 1 sq. meter, 11t ) About 2:25 a.m. local time I disconnected my air loop while SL was running , then, i reconnected SDR-IQ to my ferrite-rod antenna which was inside the room !!! ( i only managed to raise it some 40-50 cm above the floor) and to my real amusement i could still copy Markus DF6NM, also Stefan, though i got some constant qrm line almost on Stefan.. 172 freq i did not play with brightness/contrast etc.. just to see how the noise changes. Anyway, i am very happy - it is my first positive observation of a distant amateur signal on 136 kHz band ( if i have correct data Stefan grid-loc is JN49IK, Markus JN59NK so this makes 800 and 640 km , respectively) using ferrite rod antenna ( described in earlier mails). As an amplifier i have used Roelof, PA0RDT miniwhip circuit , simply
using as a high Z-input the LC parallel network.

73, Piotr, sq7mpj

qth: Lodz /jo91rs/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>