To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: PA3BCA |
From: | wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 12 Aug 2011 20:17:07 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <85D78B6541034C9A9498E9191F694BD4@PcMinto> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <85D78B6541034C9A9498E9191F694BD4@PcMinto> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 |
Hi Minto, hope you received the mail to your personal mail address.Yes, looks much better now. Your QTH seems to be plagued by similar QRM as mine. Speaking about flourescent lamps: I just bought an electronic ballast for a 36 Watt "PL-L" tube by Philips ("HF-P 136") which runs on 45 kHz, as replace for an inefficient inductor balast. No QRM from that device on any band checked so far ! And the input power consumed from lamp plus ballast drop from 44 Watt (with inductor ballast) to only 37 Watt (with electronic ballast). Not bad, since this lamp runs 12 hours a day. So not all of these new lamps deserve a bad reputation ;) 73, Wolf . |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: PA3BCA, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: PA3BCA, mal hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: PA3BCA, Minto Witteveen |
Next by Thread: | LF: DCF39, Knight Ao |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |