To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: PA0RDT polarisation |
From: | qrss <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:45:32 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <7C83B6E4275F422A83872B7E0134B689@Hugh> |
References: | <000c01cb5a7a$44cfcc50$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><[email protected]><op.vjf78o2pyzqh0k@pc-roelof><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><op.vjhyi5kpyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <[email protected]> <7C83B6E4275F422A83872B7E0134B689@Hugh> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
Hi Hugh Let me get in before the experts and we can maybe all learn some more.Polarisation is vertical, its a capacitive probe. Like all antennas it needs an earth or a counterpoise etc. Two identical PCB patches could be used as a dipole. As designed, yes, it uses the coax which can be earthed, I think the design details show it earthed prior to entering the shack. The coax picking up signals is true, again I think the design shows an isolating transformer. Positioning of an E-Probe for best performance is a case of much experimentation. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 21/06/2011 13:59, Hugh_m0wye wrote: Hello Group,My apologies if this topic has already been covered, but I have trawled backthrough many LF E-mails and can't find any discussion of it. I have been persuaded to build a PA0RDT miniwhip by Chris G4AYT, and I am most impressed by its performance so far.It is not yet in an ideal location, but the weather has not been brilliantfor out-door activities ...My question is what is its polarisation ? And leading on from that what isit acting "against"?I have reaad that it is an E-field probe, but I assume that an E-field probeis just a very short dipole.So if the patch of pcb is one arm of the dipole, is the rest of the circuit board and the feed cable the other half of the dipole, and so does this thenform part of the antenna ? In which case the instruction to place the antenna outside the building is rather a strange one, as the coax feeder would also be receiving signals right back to the radio in the shack. I tried moving the coax around while the antenna was fixed, and it didn't seem to have much effect on reception.I would guess that when the antenna is mouted as described that it is mostsensitive to vertically polarised signals - but I don't think I have seen that written down anywhere.Your thoughts on this would be much appreciated - (or perhaps someone couldpoint me to where the discussion has already been archived :-) 73 Hugh M0WYE |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: PA0RDT polarisation, Hugh_m0wye |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: PA0RDT polarisation, John Bruce McCreath |
Previous by Thread: | LF: PA0RDT polarisation, Hugh_m0wye |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: PA0RDT polarisation, John Bruce McCreath |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |