To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Signal at 8.9766225kHz |
From: | qrss <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 16 Apr 2011 17:47:50 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 |
Nothing seen on 6222 in deepest Northamptonshire.Chris is still 10dB S/N, there of traces of the overnight signal, pity it was a noisy night. The link is good now Roger thanks. The corporate web site/grabber image is all very CocaCola now:-D 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 16/04/2011 17:13, Roger Lapthorn wrote: There was a stable signal since 1400z for about 1-1.5hrs on 8.9766225kHz visible on my grabber at a similar strength to that from G3XIZ. Is this a real signal from someone?G3XIZ's signal continues to be solid and has been good copy all day. 73s Roger G3XBM -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Signal at 8.9766225kHz, Roger Lapthorn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re[2]: LF: Re[2]: LF: LF: strange signal, Alex K |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Signal at 8.9766225kHz, Roger Lapthorn |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Signal at 8.9766225kHz, Chris Dillon |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |