To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: IC718 problem |
From: | Steve Dove <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:35:30 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <6EA542075E294A1A8BA685655878A625@louis> <[email protected]> <016f01cb7750$5bd38930$0200a8c0@delld620> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) |
Hi Dave, Jim,It's the spongey rubber-VCXO used in the IF shift/ passband tuning that's by far and away the worst drifty thing in the '735. More trouble than it's worth to try and fix, and which then leaves the radio with fixed bandwidth. Sigh. Other than that, great little radio. Cheers, Steve Dave Pick wrote: JimI have an old IC735 which I have modified to give a good output from the transverter socket down to 136 (I removed a HPF) but the thing drifts horribly, no good for anything more than QRSS3. A 706 would be better. Which versions can be made to go into TX below 1.6MHz? I don't think a MkIIG can but can a MkII?Dave. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: vlf experiments-numerical considerations, pws |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: SAQ in Heidelberg, John Rabson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: IC718 problem, Dave Pick |
Next by Thread: | RE: LF: Re: IC718 problem, James Cowburn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |