Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO

from [Alberto di Bene] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO
From: Alberto di Bene <dibene@usa.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:01:04 +0100
In-reply-to: <fc7eccec0911210552o68c9421bwe45458509956a059@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4B07ABA4.4060102@online.fr> <COL122-W147B75619C9604B2D2A8E5D3A00@phx.gbl> <C8FF74A20D9540AAAF95A521083B3B12@df2py> <fc7eccec0911210552o68c9421bwe45458509956a059@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
Z-usanet-msgid: XID171NkusBi1872X38 
Of course it’s a new and exciting technology, but I doubt that it is on one

and the same level with a regular exchange and therefore should not be
considered equally verifying a valid contact.

Shades of the recurring and silly debates that every now and then happen on the 
Moon-net reflector...

73  Alberto  I2PHD



















[More with this subject...]










<Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread>




















Previous by Date: 
LF: Tail end of XGV? 20dB over noise on 137, John RABSON




Next by Date: 
LF: DI2AG daylight reports, Walter und Marianne Staubach




Previous by Thread: 
Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, M0FMT




Next by Thread: 
Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, mal hamilton




Indexes: 
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists]