Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Re: wspr |
| From: | "Johan H. Bodin" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:31:19 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <006c01ca2b34$1446abb0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
| References: | <005601ca2b2f$f97ee260$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <EC76840964DD4A818D35DD906979B23B@MaynePC> <006c01ca2b34$1446abb0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
mal hamilton wrote: > Maybe u like FICTION I like FACTS Mal, please have a look at the FACTS at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon-Hartley_theorem These are the "rules" that all kinds of communications have to obey to when information is sent through a noisy channel. Believe me, hand sent CW is no exception! I agree with you that CW is both fun and efficient, I am a keen CW operator myself by the way (QRP HF), but, by today's standards, CW is simply not the most efficient way to communicate. 73 Johan SM6LKM |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: AGC beacon, Laurence BY3A-KL1X China |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: wspr, John P-G |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: wspr, mal hamilton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: wspr, John P-G |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |