| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: M0BMU small antenna test beacon |
| From: | Richard Newstead <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:58:17 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <5A39905CAF744124A2560F59835F8821@JimPC> |
| References: | <C10E0C39C85E4C0583562B56DB0056DE@JimPC> <5A39905CAF744124A2560F59835F8821@JimPC> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
James Moritz wrote: Dear Dave, Ken, Dave, Rik, Pete, LF Group,Thanks for the reports on the beacon signal. If nothing else, it is at least a viable 500kHz TX antenna - as well as the reports, it is showing up reasonably well on the G3YXM and G4WGT grabbers. I have now closed down at 2206utc. Hi JimI was out so I missed the tests last night. What ATU configuration did you use? My system is just awaiting a suitable day for initial tests. 73 Richard G3CWI |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: SM6BHZ, Gus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re Welbrook Loops, tim hague |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: M0BMU small antenna test beacon, James Moritz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: M0BMU small antenna test beacon, James Moritz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |