Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: WSPR and CW

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: WSPR and CW
From: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:41:26 +0100
In-reply-to: <006501c96840$4ddd6380$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <006501c96840$4ddd6380$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)
Z-usanet-msgid: XID553mLAqpd1072X36

mal hamilton wrote:
Have ur EARS checked out, ASYMETRICAL ears do not work on weak signals. Any wspr signals that I have observed were visible on screen before they printed out and could be easily read had the signal been sending in QRS mode. Your observations are not accurate. If you check visibility of wspr you will find that it can be seen when it is not printing out.
G3KEV

 Funny.  I had my ears checked out three or four weeks ago at the local 
hospital,
as part of a complete checkout I do every couple of years. I have a flat 
response
on both ears from below 50 Hz to almost 12 kHz. So my ears are quite ok, thanks 
for asking.

And I am *not* comparing WSPR to QRS, read again my post. I am comparing WSPR 
to CW.
WSPR can decode on the screen what aurally is not even possible to ear. Not 
even the best,
most qualified and skilled CW operator in this world can decode what he cannot 
hear...
WSPR, on the contrary, can.

73  Alberto  I2PHD




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>